Sharechat Logo

Mercury NZ takes a crack at networks' threat to 'energy freedom'

Tuesday 7th November 2017

Text too small?

Mercury NZ chief executive Fraser Whineray has lashed out at electricity network monopolies, owners of the wires that deliver power to consumers, saying they represent a threat to people's "energy freedom".

His comments to the NZX-listed, government-controlled electricity generator and retailer's annual meeting coincided with a report from the Electricity Authority that also questioned whether regulated monopolies, such as NZX-listed Auckland network company Vector, are using their regulated asset bases to subsidise activities where they face competition from unregulated businesses.

"We detected a lack of confidence in existing open or equal access arrangements" and would now "initiate a project to further investigate the reasons for that lack of confidence", the EA said in a "next steps" report for its project into Enabling Mass Participation in the electricity market. 

Vector dismissed Whineray's claim, saying traditional electricity retailers were facing severe disruption as well as a pricing inquiry under the terms of the coalition agreement between the Labour and New Zealand First parties to form the new government.

Whineray said there was "some noise developing about several monopoly network companies seeking to extend their reach into such things as when you can charge your electric car".

"Be wary of a smokescreen of new technology which is sold as trying to enable outcomes when the real objective is to control you and constrain your Energy Freedom," he said. "Having a monopoly network company extend its reach into your home or car is totally unnecessary."

He called for reform of electricity networks "to ensure pricing structures are simplified and made more equitable for consumers", saying "there is an opportunity now to get the regulatory settings right around emerging technology and the pricing of electricity distribution".

In an emailed comment to BusinessDesk, a Vector spokesman said: "We’re not surprised by the irony of these noises of distraction, given the level of disruption that the energy sector is facing and with a review of electricity generation and retail pricing looming. 

"Regardless, our focus will remain where it should; on continuing to lead energy innovation and deliver new customer solutions with the long-term interests of consumers in mind."

Both unregulated electricity retailers and regulated network owners are jockeying to position themselves as champions of competition as the whole sector tries to glean why electricity, which did not feature heavily in the election campaign, has been singled out for a pricing review in the coalition arrangements.

The EA's mass participation project aims to ensure a level playing field that would allow, for example, rooftop solar power production to be sold back into the electricity system fairly and to prevent existing industry players gaming the system to their advantage.

Among proposals it floats is allowing more than one electricity retailer to supply a single point of supply and questions whether networks are currently able to handle such arrangements.

Also controversial is the widely made allegation that network companies don't allow competition for support services, such as the emerging use of large batteries in local networks, which could drive network costs up.

"Many parties consider a market mechanism for the network support service is an important element of an effective open access framework. We agree," the EA paper says.

Vector has recently installed a large battery in place of a sub-station in the Auckland suburb of Glen Innes as it experiments with new ways to deliver reliable energy networks using new technology.


  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Rip Curl purchase a done deal on Kathmandu proxies alone
Comvita chair Neil Craig eyes the exit once he finds a new CEO
Mercury raises guidance on increased storage, high spot prices
Eroad reports strong 3Q sales growth, eyes ASX listing
MediaWorks puts TV business on the block
NZ dollar benefits as preliminary Brexit deal improves risk appetite
ANALYSIS: Why banks don't pass on full OCR cuts
NZ Europeans make up 80% of business leaders, survey shows
Zespri tries to whet American appetite for kiwifruit
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares fall as Pushpay follows Aussie software firms lower

IRG See IRG research reports