Sharechat Logo

Questions raised over SCF payments to Maier and For Barr

By Jenny Ruth

Sunday 12th September 2010 1 Comment

Text too small?
 Jenny Ruth

A long time South Canterbury Finance (SCF) supporter is questioning the roles played by chief executive Sandy Maier and stock broker Forsyth Barr and how much they were paid in the lead up to SCF's receivership.

"Facts yet to enter the debate will follow formal answers to some highly important questions which cast doubt on the value to the taxpayer, to Hubbard or to SCF perpetual shareholders on the appointment of Sandy Maier and on the role of Forsyth Barr and, in particular, (Forsyth Barr managing director) Neil Paviour Smith," says financial adviser Chris Lee in his latest email to clients.

Maier, who has led a number of company restructures since being appointed statutory manager of the government-owned Development Finance Corporation between 1990 and 1992, was appointed SCF chief executive on December 29 last year.

Lee is questioning how much Forsyth Barr and Maier were paid for work they did for SCF.

How much Maier was paid hasn't been disclosed but Lee says: "I believe the contract paid him $5,000 per day and that a final additional payment of $1 million was held in a trust for him, whether he succeeded or not in his search for a solution."

Lee also estimates Forsyth Barr was being paid $200,000 a month to advise SCF and its total remuneration from June last year "would be nearer $10 million than $5 million." He also accuses Paviour-Smith of being "a deemed director of SCF and in may ways SCF's puppeteer."

Maier wouldn't say how much he was paid. "I don't discuss things like that," he said last week.

Paviour-Smith says he was never a SCF director and Forsyth Barr wasn't being paid anywhere near the amounts Lee estimates and wasn't being paid $200,000 a month.

While Lee says Forsyth Barr was paid 4%, or $1.1 million, for organising a $27.4 million convertible notes issue last December.

"That's not an accurate way of describing it," Paviour-Smith says. "There was a whole bunch of work we were paid for. Some of it was for capital raising." Forsyth Barr contributed "a lot of assistance over quite a number of months."

 



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

On 14 September 2010 at 1:04 pm Michael Smyth said:
Nobody could have got Allan Hubbard and South Canterbury more wrong than Chris Lee. He had unadulterated admiration for Allan Hubbard and pumped investors' funds into South Canterbury. I read him now trying to deflect attention away from his complete misjudgement and disastrous analysis of the whole finance company sector on others.
Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

The Warehouse Group - Proposed Scheme of Arrangement
Winton announces timing of its Annual Results
Fletcher Building Announces Director Appointment
Meridian issues new demand response exercise notice to NZAS
CRP - Chatham Closes Private Placement of Shares
General Finance - Olympic Term Deposit Promotion featuring a Special Bonus of 0.1%
July 22nd Morning Report
VCT - Operational performance for the year ended 30 June 2024
Challenge to banks the way to go
Bigger returns or lower risk?