Sharechat Logo

Financial adviser task force wants co-regulation

Rob Hosking

Thursday 4th August 2005

Text too small?
New rules and a single disputes resolution body's have been recommended by the government’s Task Force on Financial Intermediaries.

The changes include restrictions on who can call themselves a “personal financial adviser”, standards, and a disciplinary regime for all intermediaries.

And, in an apparent dig at the timetable released last week by the Ministry of Economic Development, which suggested implementation would not take place until 2008, Task Force chairman Michael Webb urges speed.

“If our recommendations are accepted by the Government, we believe it important that they be advanced and implemented expeditiously so as to build on the support and momentum for reform”.

Recommendations include:

  • All personal financial advisers to be members of an approved professional body
  • Restrictions on who can call themselves a “personal financial adviser”
  • A disciplinary process with effective sanctions including, where necessary, barring the adviser from practice
  • clear and concise disclosure of intermediary functions, obligations, and remuneration
  • requirements for intermediaries to comply with appropriate standards relative to their functions
As the Task Force outlined in its options paper in April, the idea is that different levels of compliance – such as disclosure and other obligations – be tied to different functions.

Intermediaries deemed to be acting in a “personal financial adviser” role will have to meet higher standards than those marketing a product.

Aimed at dealing with criticisms that too many advisers are simply “commission salesmen”, advisers who do not meet the required standard will not be able to call themselves a personal financial adviser and will be required to issue a ‘health warning’ to the consumer as to the limits of the role that they undertake, the report says.

“Effectively, this will require a substantial number of existing intermediaries who purport to, or do, provide advice tailored to the need of the individual consumer, to make a choice, namely, whether they wish to continue providing personalised financial advice with the corresponding duties (in some cases, this may require upskilling) with the corresponding benefits or whether, going forward, they confine their role to product marketing and disclose that role and its limitations to the consumer.

Commerce Minister Pete Hodgson described the report as “excellent” and “comprehensive”.

“It is anticipated that some policy options will be ready later this year, detailed work on the regulatory framework completed by the middle of 2006, with the normal legislative process to follow.”

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

NZ dollar eases on technical factors, buoyed by higher dairy prices
RBNZ eyes Westpac Australia money laundering failures
Heritage buys Golden Healthcare; not mystery Metlife suitor
Alliance margins improve as swine fever boosts global meat prices
RBNZ eyes Westpac Australia money laundering failures
Precinct eyes new developments as Commercial Bay keeps to revised schedule
End to Tower's three year dividend drought in sight
Vital Healthcare's manager appoints new independent director
Argosy lifts first-half profit 15.2% on valuation gains
Metlifecare attracts 'credible' bidder after biggest trading day in 2 1/2 years

IRG See IRG research reports