Support our sponsors:

NZX 50 Index	3326.74	2.10
S&P/ASX 200	4282.90	7.80
Dow Jones Industrials	12884.00	5.80

Twitter

Facebook

RSS

Daily ShareChat: Sky TV

By Jenny Ruth

Sunday 29th August 2010 3 Comments

Text too small?

Sky Network Television is in danger of developing "an embarrassment of riches" with an extremely under-leveraged and inefficient balance sheet with estimated gearing of just 12% by June 2014, says Sarndra Urlich, an analyst at First NZ Capital.

Sky isn't in the mature stage of its life cycle but its ever-increasing operating cashflow and a normalisation of capital spending is likely to yield a free cashflow surplus in the order of $190 million for the year ending June 2014, Urlich says.

Comparing the pay TV company with its peers implies it could easily take on an additional $300 million to $400 million in debt, she says.

"Even better, Sky has the capacity to [tax efficiently] gear up its balance sheet through increasing its payout ratio from 60% to 100%, paying out a special dividend .. and by undertaking a share buyback," she says.

"By our estimates, Sky could combine all of these measures and still maintain a robust balance sheet."
The key challenge though is Sky's 43.7% major shareholder News Corp isn't "renowned for returning capital to shareholders, preferring to grow rather than shrink its asset base."

Something needs to be done to engineer a more efficient balance sheet. "The alternative, of course, is that this embarrassment of riches makes Sky a very attractive corporate target."

Recommendation: Neutral.

Daily ShareChat articles report how the main experts in the market might view a certain share and we provide this commentary as a useful resource for investors. Content on this site does not in any way constitute a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any particular share. Investors should always seek professional advice before making any investment decisions.

Comments from our readers

On 30 August 2010 at 11:01 am terry said:

no wonder they have an abundance of riches when they feed us the same old movies etc over and over again. they are not spending on new programmes .

On 14 September 2010 at 5:43 pm Alex said:

Seriously thinking, why not go to Freeview, perhaps with a tivo, to miss the ads. $60 a month, would pay for a lot of rental movies a month. nOt much else on Sky, Living channel screened a 1999 Property Ladder recently

On 1 January 2011 at 9:56 am Neil said:

Sky has a wide moat with the big advantages of an and running system, the expense of replicating it and the growing amount of cash being churned out.

Add your comment:

Your name:
Your email:	Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.