Sharechat Logo

Foreign investors face maximum penalty for breach after $13M purchase

Monday 15th July 2019

Text too small?

Overseas investors who paid $13 million for five hectares of land in Auckland have been told to pay $300,000 to the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) and sell the 117-lot development they started within two years. 

In a decision released on Friday, Justice Grant Powell approved the maximum penalty for BCH Investments after the company admitted it was an overseas person that had acquired sensitive land, a breach of the Overseas Investment Act.  

The Albany property adjoins a scenic reserve, which made it sensitive and requiring OIO approval, the High Court at Auckland said. 

BCH is directed and owned by Xianghua Huang and Qian Yu Bu, Companies Office records show.  

While the OIO can also receive a developer’s gains on a property, in this case there was no financial benefit to BCH in carrying out the 117-lot development. 

Justice Powell’s judgment said despite the project not making money it was nonetheless a significant undertaking and given the size, scope and nature of the development the firm should have undertaken explicit enquiries as to its obligations under the law. 

“This case shows the importance for investors to seek the right advice when making overseas investments. This includes choosing a suitably qualified lawyer and asking the right questions,” Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) group manager Vanessa Horne said. 

LINZ, which oversees OIO breaches, issued proceedings against BCH two years ago, but then worked with the company to enable the subdivision to be completed. It was able to do this because BCH admitted liability four months after LINZ brought the case and put in KPMG as an account taker.

The judge said KPMG should be paid $260,000 for its costs, which BCH must pay in addition to the $300,000 penalty. 

In July this year, the High Court ordered Chinese businessmen Zhongliang Hong and Xueli Ke, and IRL Investment and Grand Energetic Company, to pay $2.95 million for breaching the Overseas Investment Act when they bought two properties in 2012 and 2014. 

(BusinessDesk)



  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

Mandatory farm plans scorned as 'tick box' exercises
Kiwi dollar firms on weak US retail data, capped by rate-cut expectations
17th October 2019 Morning Report
SkyCity hoses down union claims over potential job losses
OPINION: Fair Payment Agreements and 'swallowing vomit' - the lot of the CTU
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares gain; Restaurant Brands climbs on upbeat outlook
NZ dollar stalls after Bascand's rate cut comments
Bascand says RBNZ will consider changing bank capital proposals
Affordable electricity key to decarbonisation - Genesis
Graeme Hart trims global packaging empire with US$615m asset sale

IRG See IRG research reports