By Mike Ross
Friday 16th June 2000
|Text too small?|
|SEEING RED: The accounting standard would have had a big effect on Lion Breweries' gearing ratios and asset backing per share|
Opponents want to see a home-grown accounting standard for intangibles which departs from current overseas practice.
Nearly 40 submissions were received by the Chartered Accountants Institute on ED-87, Accounting for Intangible Assets - a staggering number of submissions for something as mundane as a proposed new accounting standard.
The commercial significance of the proposed standard is apparent when companies like Lion Breweries have over half its balance sheet assets recorded as intangible assets in the form of brands.
Removing these assets from the balance sheet would have a substantial effect on gearing ratios and asset backing per share.
There is no current accounting standard in New Zealand dealing with intangible assets such as brands, copyrights and client lists.
ED-87, which allows acquired intangible assets, but not internally generated intangibles to go on balance sheet, is a copy of current overseas accounting standards.
When ED-87 was released for public submissions last year, the Chartered Accountants Institute expected there would be some hostility.
Liz Hickey, chairwoman of the Institute's financial reporting standards board, said two major issues surfaced. One was the recognition and revaluation of intangible assets. The other was amortisation: the period over which intangible assets have to be written off.
Those calling for balance sheet recognition of internally generated brands argue this complies with the statement of concepts.
Operating as a guide to fundamental principles, the statement of concepts defines asset and liability in economic terms.
Opponents of the current ED-87 say the statement of concepts requires balance sheet recognition of assets when there is "a cost or other value that can be measured with reliability."
Specialist valuers can provide reliable valuations for internally generated brands, they say.
Ms Hickey said what would be critical was determining whether intangible assets can be reliably valued when there is no active market for the asset.
She said this issue would be studied by a working group before any more progress was made on a new accounting standard.
It would also study the question of amortisation.
ED-87 requires intangible assets to be written off over a period of not more than 20 years.
Some submissions argued that many brands and trademarks were not subject to wear and tear and theoretically never wore out.
No comments yet
NZ dollar benefits from dovish Fed, domestic growth
Fisher Funds backs Infratil's Vodafone play
Ballance partners with Hiringa for Kapuni hydrogen project
Kiwi Property eyes residential development for mixed-use centres
Strong construction growth shores up 1Q GDP but services weak
Sharesies to offer fractionalised NZX shares
20th June 2019 Morning Report
NZ dollar steady ahead of Fed decision, NZ GDP
Vital proceeds with $37m first stage of Wakefield Hospital redevelopment
Risks from exploration ban coming to pass