By Alan J Robb
Friday 8th September 2000
|Text too small?|
The latest release from the company also opens it to criticism in its use of a variant of ebitda, which was criticised last week in relation to Advantage and Sky Network Television as not being a measure of profitability or cashflow; in fact having no redeeming features (NBR, September 1).
Air New Zealand's creation, ebitdra, is even more meaningless. It appears to have passed unnoticed by all financial reporters, who have simply reprinted the fact it increased 14.3% to $664 million without asking the fundamental question: "Does ebitdra mean anything?"
Ebitdra is defined in the chairman's overview of results as being "earnings before interest, depreciation, rentals and amortisation." Recent financial statements have not shown any rentals as such but the company does have substantial lease obligations for aircraft and properties.
In its previous balance sheet it reported liabilities of $199.2 million for capitalised finance leases and commitments of $582.9 million for operating leases. The amounts payable within one year of balance date were a little over $256 million.
This is almost exactly the amount incorporated in the computation of ebitdra, given that interest expense was $72 million and depreciation and amortisation was $185.8 million.
In other words, Air New Zealand spent $256 million or over $5 million dollars a week leasing aircraft. It was an essential outgoing to earn the revenue. It was both an expense and a cashflow. Had it not been paid, there would have been no revenue, no earnings.
How then can there be any point in computing a figure for earnings before rentals (or interest, taxes, depreciation or amortisations)? Like ebitda it does not measure profitability or cashflow. Air New Zealand does its shareholders no service by including it in the chairman's overview.
Air New Zealand, and those public relations experts who are tempted to report such meaningless numbers, would benefit by reading a recent report from Moody's Investors Services entitled Putting ebitda in perspective: 10 critical failings of ebitda as the principal determinant of cash flow.
Pamela Stumpp, a senior vice-president with Moody's, warns ebitda:
Perhaps ebitda and its relations should be known collectively as ebitdaft - earnings before items that are damnably awkward and factually true.
Alan Robb is a senior lecturer in accountancy at the University of Canterbury. He holds no shares in Air New Zealand
No comments yet
NZ dollar weakens on global tensions, weak local manufacturing
General Capital (GEN:NZ) releases strong preliminary result
Burger Fuel turns to profit as it changes direction
Contact secures winter gas from OMV
Arrow International liquidators find $40M of notional assets
Forestry encroachment an issue for councils - Sage
NZSA concerned Kiwi Property paying too much in dividends
NZ food prices rise an annual 1.7% in May, rental inflation steady
Provincial centres lead the way in UFB uptake
Manufacturing grows at slowest pace in more than six years