Sharechat Logo

Vector on negative credit watch as S and P gets dark on NZ regulatory regime

Wednesday 27th November 2013 1 Comment

Text too small?

Auckland lines company Vector has had its BBB+ credit rating placed on negative credit watch after global rating agency Standard & Poor's decided New Zealand's regulatory regime is less stable and a higher risk than in other nations.

The notice means Vector's rating has a 50/50 chance of being cut over the next three months, though chief executive Simon Mackenzie said he didn't believe there would be any immediate financial or customer impact from the change because of the long-dated duration of the company's debt.

"Their assessment is that the regime is less stable than other regimes internationally and they see it as a higher risk," Mackenzie said. "Vector continues to work with the government and other agencies to establish a more mature and stable regulatory regime."

Last week S&P completed changes to how it rates corporate industrial and utility companies and yesterday placed 23 firms across Asia Pacific on either positive or negative credit watch.

Shares in Vector edged up 0.4 percent to $2.60 yesterday, and have shed 4.4 percent this year, lagging the 15 percent gain on the NZX All Index, a capital measure of domestic stocks, over the same period.

The notice comes a day after the National Business Review reported an Australian fund manager was refusing to invest in locally regulated firms due to the government's handling of the Commerce Commission-enforced cuts to Chorus's monopoly copper line services.

Local fund managers have warned the government's response, which has been to call in Ernst & Young Australia to run the ruler over Chorus's books before making any decision, was seen as slow and left investors in a heightened period of uncertainty when dealing with regulated firms.

Vector is also locked in a long-running battle with the Commerce Commission over how prices for regulated electricity and gas distribution services should be set, joined by several other regulated monopolies. A decision from a High Court merits review of the commission's methodologies has been due for some months.

On top of that has been the Opposition parties' plan to overhaul the electricity market if they win next year's general election by introducing a central buyer of wholesale electricity in a bid to provide cheaper retail power at the expense of investors in the electricity sector.

 

BusinessDesk.co.nz

Bond Offer: Infratil Ltd, 7.2 year & 10.2 year unsecured unsubordinated bond


  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

On 28 November 2013 at 12:50 pm tt said:
A balance is really needed here, so investors get paid a fair return and consumers get a good deal. Going too extreme one way or the other would leave everyone worse off in the long run.
Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.

Related News:

NZ dollar mixed, buffeted by Fed talk and downunder data
Super Fund can expect lower returns over next decade - review
ANALYSIS: Should penalties for continuous disclosure breaches be relaxed?
Fletcher seeks urgent talks on Ihumatao stalemate
NZ economy grows 0.5% in June quarter, beating expectations
Restaurant Brands lifts 2Q sales; appetite for KFC offsets ditched Starbucks
Auckland jet fuel arrangements a potential barrier to new entrants
NZ dollar weaker after Fed split on outlook for further US cuts
Leading judge says court administration model 'outdated'
MARKET CLOSE: NZ shares fall; Goodman placement sees property stocks sold

IRG See IRG research reports