By Campbell McIlroy
Friday 22nd September 2000
|Text too small?|
Papers were filed in the High Court at Wellington on Tuesday.
Whangarei accountant and investor Brian Moyle said the objectors included at least one shareholder in each of the 27 companies in the merger, including one shareholder with shares in 17 of the companies.
Mr Moyle said the merged company could leave original shareholders in an investment which fundamentally differed from what they had originally subscribed to.
The dissenting share holders wanted to be paid out, based on the valuations Waltus used for the merger proposal, Mr Moyle said.
Counsel for the group, Hamish McIntosh, of Russell McVeagh, said ideally those in the successful syndicates would not want the merger to go ahead, but the best option would be for Waltus to buy them out.
He said it was likely more investors would join the group once the challenge became public knowledge.
About 10% of shareholders voted against the merger. If they all joined the action, and assuming they held 10% of the company's shares, the payout could cost Waltus $22 million.
Analysts suggested this could overburden the merged companies with debt and call its viability into question .
A preliminary hearing has been set down for September 25 in the High Court at Wellington.
No comments yet
NZ dollar headed for 1.3% weekly gain on expectations of a Fed rate cut
RBNZ knock-back gives Resolution chance to low-ball AMP - Jarden
Rail hubs may not boost Napier Port log trade
O'Connor looks to overhaul Biosecurity Act, improve animal tracing
Denton Morrell undefended at liquidation hearing
Contact steam to heat Norske Skog pellet business secured
Air NZ to amend booking engine after lawyer’s complaint
Ross McEwan to take helm at NAB
KPMG says bank capital proposals will wreck havoc on dairy farmers
Mild weather saps Vector's June-qtr volumes