Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - April 2004

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks


From: "Cristine Kerr" <criskerr@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:23:36 +1000


Hi David,
 
Could be. You would need to look through all ASX announcements to locate that info.
 
Regards,
Cris
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks

guess one thing i would like to know is who the major shareholders are?
Is the "smart money in this stock"
ie:microcap investment funds,the old melb money etc??

============================================================
From: "Cristine Kerr" <criskerr@optusnet.com.au>
Date: 2004/04/02 Fri PM 03:08:31 GMT+12:00
To: <sharechat@sharechat.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks

Karyn,

I only had a quick look at one of the stocks you mentioned.

TNE - TECHNOLOGY ONE LIMITED

2.2.04 - CBA on 28.1.04 DISPOSED
- 33748804 down to 28199006

8.3.04 - CBA on 3.3.04 DISPOSED
- 28,199,006 to 25,230,267 (8.45%)
15.3.04  - Ronald McLean (Director) on 12.3.04 DISPOSED
- 400,000 shares for $240,000
- NOTE: NUMBER HELD AFTER CHANGE - ZERO

Is this your best argument for everyone to listen to your doomsday advice and stock recommendations?

Have a great day,
Cris

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Karyn W
  To: sharechat@sharechat.co.nz
  Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:30 PM
  Subject: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks


  Hi
  What MUL do is buy bandwidth from a satellilte owner, and onsell it in
  various guises with a margin to customers.  They do not do anything
  different from any other telco or ISP, it is only the technology that is
  different.  If you rang Telstra, Optus and AAPT they will all be able to
  sell you the exact same service that MUL provides.
  However, whether you are a reseller of fibre, ATM, xDSL, copper, cable, 3G,
  or satellite bandwidth, the business model is the same, the competitive
  issues are similar, the services delivered over the bandwidth identical. 
  The choice of delivery mechanism of these IP services depends on
  availability, price, and suitability for the service.  The market for
  satellite bandwidth is actually a niche one - as landline access is now
  pretty ubiquitous, and where it is not, mobile providers are moving in (eg.
  Africa, Iraq)

  All major telcos and many ISPs use satellite bandwidth in some form or
  another, as it used to be a lot cheaper than buying fibre (up until the big
  cables like Southern Cross came online, then the price differential went the
  other way).  Nowadays the most common reason to stick with using satellite
  is to provide an alternative redundant path to the land-based cables, ie. in
  the event of Southern Cross or its ilk being damaged, the Internet traffic
  can be routed via satellite.  This is one reason why Defence services like
  it - it is less vulnerable to physical interference than land-based
  transmission mechanisms.

  Ihug (part of iiNet) in NZ and Australia has been offering satellite
  services since around 1996 - http://www.ihug.com.au/getultra/satellite.html
  - both at a consumer and wholesale ISP level.  However, its limitations
  (such as rain fade) have meant that it is not preferable to a land-based
  technology, and therefore never really took off.

  I've worked for telcos/ISP's since 1995, so I'd like to warn people to not
  be snowed by the profilic use of technology terms, the steady stream of
  press releases, announcements of "big contracts", etc because I've seen it
  all before, and I know that the reality is that they dont mean anything! The
  fact that they have to announce these things at all (when every other
  telco/ISP treats similar deals as business as usual) just signals how
  desperate they are to con the uninformed and technology illiterate public.

  (For the record, I also have issues with the bullshit that SKG announce on a
  regular basis for the same reasons - most of the stuff is so passe now that
  their "deals" are simply copying what other providers have already been
  doing for several years now.  For instance, I was discussing wireless
  broadband global roaming with iPass back in 2001!)

  MUL is a small company, operating in a global market, with no competitive
  advantage, subject to intense competitive pressures due to oversupply, a
  market dominated by large telcos with very deep pockets, and with new
  entrants (eg. 3G providers) set to erode their market niche.   That is not
  to say that they are a bad company - they may be around forever, they may
  make profits and even provide a good return on capital, but the fact is is
  that in this industry things change so quickly that crystal ball gazing is
  damn near impossible - after all, a few years ago we were all certain that
  grocery shopping and buying pet food online was going to be huge too!

  I am a cynic - if I saw a run of "big" announcements followed by a director
  selling out, then I'd be doing the same!

  I think David said it best ("Lets party like its 1999), and add that "those
  who do not learn from  history are condemned to repeat it".

  Now on an upside - if you do want some decent tech stocks to invest in, then
  take a look at TNE, VGL, DTL on the ASX (all pay a 5%-7% dividend) and RNS,
  PVO on the NZX.  I prefer to "invest" in tech, not "speculate" - as I learnt
  my lesson in the 90's and will not repeat it :-(

  Karyn

  _________________________________________________________________
  Get Extra Storage in 10MB, 25MB, 50MB and 100MB options now! Go to 
  http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-au&page=hotmail/es2


  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
  http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/

============================================================


David Maire
National Sales Manager
Navman Wireless Australasia
+61416066583


Karyn,
 
I only had a quick look at one of the stocks you mentioned.
 
TNE - TECHNOLOGY ONE LIMITED
 
2.2.04 - CBA on 28.1.04 DISPOSED
- 33748804 down to 28199006
 
8.3.04 - CBA on 3.3.04 DISPOSED
- 28,199,006 to 25,230,267 (8.45%)
15.3.04  - Ronald McLean (Director) on 12.3.04 DISPOSED
- 400,000 shares for $240,000
- NOTE: NUMBER HELD AFTER CHANGE - ZERO
 
Is this your best argument for everyone to listen to your doomsday advice and stock recommendations?
 
Have a great day,
Cris
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Karyn W
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks

Hi
What MUL do is buy bandwidth from a satellilte owner, and onsell it in
various guises with a margin to customers.  They do not do anything
different from any other telco or ISP, it is only the technology that is
different.  If you rang Telstra, Optus and AAPT they will all be able to
sell you the exact same service that MUL provides.
However, whether you are a reseller of fibre, ATM, xDSL, copper, cable, 3G,
or satellite bandwidth, the business model is the same, the competitive
issues are similar, the services delivered over the bandwidth identical. 
The choice of delivery mechanism of these IP services depends on
availability, price, and suitability for the service.  The market for
satellite bandwidth is actually a niche one - as landline access is now
pretty ubiquitous, and where it is not, mobile providers are moving in (eg.
Africa, Iraq)

All major telcos and many ISPs use satellite bandwidth in some form or
another, as it used to be a lot cheaper than buying fibre (up until the big
cables like Southern Cross came online, then the price differential went the
other way).  Nowadays the most common reason to stick with using satellite
is to provide an alternative redundant path to the land-based cables, ie. in
the event of Southern Cross or its ilk being damaged, the Internet traffic
can be routed via satellite.  This is one reason why Defence services like
it - it is less vulnerable to physical interference than land-based
transmission mechanisms.

Ihug (part of iiNet) in NZ and Australia has been offering satellite
services since around 1996 - http://www.ihug.com.au/getultra/satellite.html
- both at a consumer and wholesale ISP level.  However, its limitations
(such as rain fade) have meant that it is not preferable to a land-based
technology, and therefore never really took off.

I've worked for telcos/ISP's since 1995, so I'd like to warn people to not
be snowed by the profilic use of technology terms, the steady stream of
press releases, announcements of "big contracts", etc because I've seen it
all before, and I know that the reality is that they dont mean anything! The
fact that they have to announce these things at all (when every other
telco/ISP treats similar deals as business as usual) just signals how
desperate they are to con the uninformed and technology illiterate public.

(For the record, I also have issues with the bullshit that SKG announce on a
regular basis for the same reasons - most of the stuff is so passe now that
their "deals" are simply copying what other providers have already been
doing for several years now.  For instance, I was discussing wireless
broadband global roaming with iPass back in 2001!)

MUL is a small company, operating in a global market, with no competitive
advantage, subject to intense competitive pressures due to oversupply, a
market dominated by large telcos with very deep pockets, and with new
entrants (eg. 3G providers) set to erode their market niche.   That is not
to say that they are a bad company - they may be around forever, they may
make profits and even provide a good return on capital, but the fact is is
that in this industry things change so quickly that crystal ball gazing is
damn near impossible - after all, a few years ago we were all certain that
grocery shopping and buying pet food online was going to be huge too!

I am a cynic - if I saw a run of "big" announcements followed by a director
selling out, then I'd be doing the same!

I think David said it best ("Lets party like its 1999), and add that "those
who do not learn from  history are condemned to repeat it".

Now on an upside - if you do want some decent tech stocks to invest in, then
take a look at TNE, VGL, DTL on the ASX (all pay a 5%-7% dividend) and RNS,
PVO on the NZX.  I prefer to "invest" in tech, not "speculate" - as I learnt
my lesson in the 90's and will not repeat it :-(

Karyn

_________________________________________________________________
Get Extra Storage in 10MB, 25MB, 50MB and 100MB options now! Go to 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-au&page=hotmail/es2


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/chat/forum/

References

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks Karyn W
Previous by Date: Re: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks David Maire ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks Karyn W
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: [sharechat] RE: MUL and other technology stocks David Maire ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]