Forum Archive Index - August 2001

["G Stolwyk" <stolwyk@wave.co.nz>]

Yes, I believe that a 2:1 or 3:1split is justified. 

 

As a consequence, we could see another 10% increase in price.

 

There could be some criticism about some of the smaller acquisitions at the Annual meeting. To announce a split then, would be good timing!

 

I believe that the price at this stage is stagnating somewhat and a share split will assist to overcome the problem of liquidity.

 

But an additional reason is to make any takeover by another company, expensive! 

 

A lower share price could also be more acceptable by the critics of gaming.

 

There we are: Three powerful reasons to have a share split; what is your comment, please.

 

Gerry

Holds SKC; I reported earlier that profit had risen by 16%; that should read 13%.