Sharechat Logo

Forum Archive Index - May 2001

Please note usage of the Forum is subject to the Terms & Conditions.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date Previous by Date ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread Previous by Thread ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]
Printable version
 

Re: [sharechat] AIR balance sheet


From: "John Weernink" <johnw@cybernet.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 20:08:29 +1200


Thanks Peter for you summary.

I quite agree with the similarity to FFS. One burnt you don't touch
companies like AIR until they are rock bottom. Quite a while ago I suggested
that $0.75 was a price to consider entering AIR. Reading your story, which
is very plausible, $0.50 is maybe an entry into AIR worth considering.

John

Disclosure: Current holding: NONE. Use to own AIR a long time ago


Subject: [sharechat] AIR balance sheet
From: "Peter Maiden" <pmaiden@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 10:08:49 +1200

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

The capital structure of some companies have come under scrutiny lately.
This is one area where the longer term investor tends to overlook when
evaluating an investment.

This is usually to their detriment as TEL shareholders found out this week.
The issue of 91 million new shares has diluted the interest of exisiting
shareholders and they now need to wait to see whether the benefits of a
stronger TEL balance sheet will be reflected in the shareprice over time.
Didn't help TEL shareholders last week though.

Of course the other big company needing to do something with their balance
sheet is AIR. I do try to avoid talking about AIR but as they are now my
employers preferred airline they now have a greater share of mind - I can't
avoid their presence.  I also have an interest in how corporations structure
their capital requirements. Above all the current AIR story is developing
into an intriguing one, and one we will hear a lot more about of in the
future.

And it can't keep out of the press. Good article by Fran O'Sullivan in The
Herald this week which put a pretty positive light on current affairs and
highlighted the importance of Ansett in securing the feeder routes in
Australia to ensure the future of AIR's international activities. Then again
there was a good piece from Chalkie in The Independent in which he felt no
sorrow for BIL's part in the Ansett affair and thought it rather ironic that
BIL would possibly have to front up with more dosh - maybe that is why BIL
have cashed up their Hardies investment..

Back to AIR's balance sheet - badly undercapitalised. Even taking into
account the much touted pile of cash they have AIR has a debt to capital
ratio of 66%. For comparison the Qantas figure is 50%. To get back to a more
respectable 50% AIR needs to reduce debt by $1.7B or increase it's
shareholder's equity by $1.7B. These numbers are baseed on the December
balance sheet.

Some asset sales and some more cash generated over the next few months will
help the situation and no doubt they will not not want to get down to a 50%
debt to capital ratio in one go.

However a fugure of $0.75B needed in new capital is a good figure to work
with.

Assuming that AIR do not really want to sell Ansett the only real
alternative is to either find new shareholder money or go to existing
shareholders with another rights issue,

With 3/4 million shares currently on issue the amount needed is about $1 a
share - would current shareholders (assuming SIA and BIL front up) be happy
fronting up with a $1 for every share held?  That is the size of the
problem - very much like FFS.

But if the equivalent amount of new capital was raised another way current
shareholders interests would still be diluted by 50%..

The current AIR situation isn't pretty. It appears that shareholders will be
affected in a big way one way or the other.  There is still a lot of water
to flow under the bridge yet.

When at the airport the other day I asked the delectable looking Wendy (the
AIR uniform doesn't do her justice) what she thought about AIR
recapitalisating (inside info?). Her response was that as long it put more
into her pay packet she thought it would a good idea.

Those are my views - shoot me down in flames if I've got it all wrong.

Peter


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/          New Zealand's home for market investors
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To remove yourself from this list, please use the form at
http://www.sharechat.co.nz/forum.shtml.

 
Messages by Date [ Next by Date: [sharechat] Competition for FRU ? Colin Ross
Previous by Date: [sharechat] Investment portfolio computer programme Phaedrus ]
Messages by Thread [ Next by Thread: [sharechat] Polarized Fractal Efficiency Phaedrus
Previous by Thread: [sharechat] AIR balance sheet Peter Maiden ]
Post to the Forum [ New message Reply to this message ]

IRG See IRG research reports