| 
		
			Printable version | 
		
| From: | "Oliver Shapleski" <oliver.shapleski@vuw.ac.nz> | 
| Date: | Wed, 24 May 2000 12:28:58 +1200 | 
| 
 Thought some people might need the flaw pointed out 
to them - hence the problems with NTA.  FFS has debt - true.  This 
debt is a negative on the balance sheet to the full extent of the debt.  
Possibly $700m, I don't know (I reiterate my point made  a few months 
back - which letter stock actually "owns" the debt is in many circumstances 
unclear).   
If a profitable company bought FFS, the value of 
the debt isn't necessarily -$700m.  It depends entirely on the applicable 
tax laws, but if the transaction is structured to allow Loss Carry Forward and 
the tax rate is 33%, then the value of the debt increases by 700m*0.33 i.e. 
roughly $230m.   
People need to consider tax implications a 
bit mote thoroughly.  Few investment analysts have any idea - they 
don't understand any of the law - leading to many different valuations and some 
of these are very misleading, usually with too much downside.  
 
Oliver 
 | 
Replies
  |