Sharechat Logo

PPCS 'hasn't got Richmond yet'

By NZPA

Friday 14th March 2003

Text too small?
South Island meat company PPCS was leading Richmond shareholders to believe it had won the takeover bid for Richmond Ltd, but the battle was far from over, a spokesman for concerned shareholders, John Foster, said today.

Mr Foster, a former Richmond chief executive, said statements from PPCS following the company's purchase of Lowe Corporation shares this week attempted to indicate that the company had already won control of Richmond.

"But when PPCS says it now owns 56.9 percent of the total voting rights it fails to inform shareholders - and the public - that on April 22, under a court order, it will lose the voting rights to 42.98 percent of Richmond shares," Mr Foster said.

He is one of 10 shareholders in the Bell Group, which took PPCS to court last year.

The case saw the Dunedin-based company's actions in obtaining Richmond shares deemed by Justice Young as being "a deliberate, flagrant and contumelious breach of the substantial security holder regime", and PPCS was ordered to forfeit 42.98 percent of its voting rights (on April 22).

"This will leave PPCS with just 24.38 percent of the remaining voting rights, or well less than halfway toward the number of shares it needs to control Richmond," Mr Foster said.

In its statement earlier this week, PPCS encouraged shareholders to sell their shares by increasing its offer price from $3.05 to $3.11 a share and making the offer unconditional.

The PPCS offer closes on March 28.

"It's no wonder they are 'strongly encouraging all shareholders to accept their offer'. It is a less- than-honest approach in informing shareholders. The battle is not over," Mr Foster said.

  General Finance Advertising    

Comments from our readers

No comments yet

Add your comment:
Your name:
Your email:
Not displayed to the public
Comment:
Comments to Sharechat go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved. It is allowable to use some form of non-de-plume for your name, however we recommend real email addresses are used. Comments from free email addresses such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc may not be approved.