Archive for the ‘Foreign Exchange’ Category
Thursday, October 21st, 2010
So this week, much to everyone’s surprise, Beijing blinked.
For months, China has been under growing pressure to let the value of its currency, the yuan, rise to reflect China’s growing might and to meet America’s need for a weak currency export competitiveness boost to get it over this indigestion it’s still experiencing.
For months, China has resisted, while continuing to lap up US Treasury bonds, the next tranche of which was signalled this week by US Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke.
Already known already as “QE2”, or the second round of quantitative easing – the polite rich world way of saying “printing money” – there would appear to be a truck-load more American debt coming to market to keep things moving in the world’s biggest economy as the fiscal expansionism recedes.
Everywhere in the First World, governments are spending less than they were to keep the ship afloat during the financial crisis. Now, it seems, monetary policy will pick up some of the slack, leaving global interest rates low for the foreseeable future.
What a pity everyone’s too gun-shy to bolt for equities at times like this.
However, this week, the Chinese authorities signalled what everyone has suspected – their economy is growing far too fast, inflation is a risk, and it’s time to cool it. Data due for public release today should confirm this.
So, Chinese official interest rates went up, in the first serious response to Western pressure to recognise the inevitable: that China is getting rich fast, and that rich countries’ currencies get stronger.
Just one problem: unlike the West, there’s no market-driven link between official interest rates and the exchange rate. So, from a US perspective, the yuan is as undervalued as ever, since higher interest rates have had no impact on the currency.
Still, just to show they’re sometimes willing to play fair, China has changed one thing. Instead of raising its official interest rate by, say, 23 or 27 basis points, it has this time gone for 25 basis points.
To those who watch these things closely, that in itself is significant. The obtusity of picking interest rates that resembled but weren’t the same as the West’s was a long-standing part of Chinese Communist Party repartee.
The use of a 25 basis points move is seen as a finger-wave in the direction of falling into line with Rich World standard financial practice.
Meanwhile, in China itself, Fonterra has just announced it’s spending $42 million on another Chinese dairy farm, to be stocked with cows from New Zealand.
Not a huge purchase, but obviously important enough for Fonterra to drag a bunch of New Zealand journalists to Beijing to see the deal inked, among them our own Jonathan Underhill.
Intriguingly, given the debate at home on foreign ownership of farmland, the Fonterra deal is underpinned by a long-term lease, private ownership of land being impossible in the People’s Republic.
And the deal coincides, whether by design or accident, with an impassioned proposal from a Beijing resident Kiwi business leader for New Zealand to adopt a leasehold model to deal with New Zealanders’ fears about foreign farmland sales.
David Mahon is no dummy. He’s one of the most respected sources of advice for New Zealanders looking to trade in China and head of New Zealand Trade and Enterprise’s Beach Head Programme there.
By converting all farmland to leasehold, Mahon says New Zealand could more easily deal fairly and rationally with Chinese or any other foreign investor.
To do otherwise – especially to ban foreign farm ownership – would be an “irrational, retrograde and racist act,” Mahon says.
“New Zealand must not even suggest a return to those paranoid years.”
Could Mahon be onto something? The Save the Farms campaign has enough money to gain traction, and the festering national debate on foreign, especially Asian, farmland ownership continues. Could a leasehold approach lance the boil?
Think about it: the apparently unachievable demand by Federated Farmers chairman Don Nicolson for “reciprocity” of investment rules between nations that buy our farms would be achieved with Chinese investors if they could only buy long-term leases, not the land itself.
“The question before New Zealand is not how to block foreign investment in the agricultural sector, but rather how to prevent the purchase of agricultural land by interests that will not develop it to its full potential,” says Mahon.
“As long as land can be purchased without the obligation to use it for the common good of all New Zealanders, the country’s economic future, which depends so much upon agriculture, is in doubt.”
Of course, there are a few snags. Leasehold land is less valuable than freehold, so anyone looking to sell or concerned about the value of their land is not going to like it.
But hey. Just today, an anti-union protest in Wellington involving the groovily grungy film production community way out-numbered an earlier protest march marking a national day of trade union action and solidarity.
These are topsy-turvy times. Anything could happen.
Posted in Economy, Foreign Exchange, Investing, Politics | No Comments »
Friday, August 20th, 2010
As the world economic system strives to right itself from what has been called the Credit Crunch or the Great Recession, or any other euphemistic tag designed to understate the significance of what we face, one of the very interesting recent trends has been the increasing willingness for large establishment organisations to begin talking honestly about the ‘really big numbers’.
Two examples of particular note studied the overall US situation through the eyes of the IMF and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
As I pointed out back in January in my look at the United States, rather than messing around trying to understand the danger of a Federal debt level heading rapidly towards 100% of GDP at US$13 trillion, sooner or later we would need to face up to the really big numbers due to the under-funding in superannuation and medicare that threatens to seriously derail the expectations of retiring ‘baby-boomers’ everywhere.
I stated the following: “if you take the present estimated shortfall in unfunded government promises in superannuation and medicare and add that to the present US Government debt, this together comes to around US$114.7 trillion. Next you take the total outstanding personal debt, then the 50 States, together with net corporate; this all amounts to about a further US$40 trillion; now add all this together (US$154.7 trillion) and divide by the population of 300 million and every person in the USA has somehow to shoulder their burden of a debt present and coming of US$515,666.”
Well, as fantastic as it may seem, I was wrong – a new figure calculated from CBO estimates by Professor Laurence Kotlikoff suggests the number should be closer to US$202 trillion, or 15 times the present GDP.
This represents what is called the ‘fiscal gap’, and is the present value of the difference between projected spending (including servicing official debt) and projected revenue in all future years. The IMF adds that the “closing of the fiscal gap requires a permanent annual fiscal adjustment equal to about 14% of US GDP”.
Now it just so happens that the present federal revenue is about 15% of GDP. So the IMF and CBO are together effectively saying that to close this fiscal gap requires a doubling of all federal taxation. This is both a political and an economic impossibility.
(And this is before we even look at the implications of an OTC derivatives market that is even now at least 15 times the size of the entire global economy, even though we don’t apparently talk about this anymore).
The question arises, how could the US fiscal gap get this enormous? The answer is very simple – the entire Western world has promised itself in retirement far more than the system can possibly provide and no-one has been brave enough to face this. It’s a political no-no everywhere. In America they have 78 million baby-boomers who when fully retired expect to collect entitlements in social security and medicare that on average exceed per-capita GDP.
As Professor Kotlikoff puts it: “This is what happens when you run a ponzi scheme for six decades straight, taking ever larger resources from the young and giving them to the old, while promising the young their eventual turn at passing the generational buck.”
Or as Henry Lamb said: “Democracy collapses when the majority discovers it can vote for itself treasure from the public coffers. Democracy is the last plateau of social order before anarchy!”
And the sad truth is that our politicians have been fully complicit in this fraud on future generations for the entire period of its genesis. In fact they have encouraged it, competing with each other in the clear knowledge that the greater their promises, the more likely they are to govern.
Unsurprisingly, the waspish Mark Twain had perhaps the best line on this subject too: “Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.”
I’ve concentrated on the US so far for three reasons – they’re the biggest, they have the most weapons and their numbers are being studied with the greatest vigor – the rest of us are just hoping it’s all not true, and particularly, that it isn’t going to impact us personally.
Well there’s shocking news coming for anyone who thinks what they’ve been promised is what they’ll be getting. There isn’t a single chance that the deep-seated reality of demographics will not ultimately overwhelm the federal budgets of every Western country, and that the present economic crisis will one day be seen as the beginnings of such a process.
It is only now, almost three years from the first signs of trouble, that the discussions on the implications of demographics are bubbling to the surface, although it has been obvious for maybe 30 years that the numbers were simply not going to work.
The OECD has recently chimed in on the topic and its calculations bring no greater comfort – being the OECD the figures will almost certainly be conservative but for example suggest unfunded liabilities of 330% of GDP for France, 190% for Germany, 150% for Japan and 130% for Italy.
These are in addition to the existing sovereign, banking and personal exposures to debt that I have detailed in earlier posts, and which alone appear sufficiently large to permanently alter the present concept of economic (and maybe even social) normality.
When one considers that history suggests a country’s population never recovers once the birth rate drops to lower that 19 births per 1,000 and that most Western countries are in the range of eight to 14, then some serious re-thinking of the efficacy of the present capitalist model is long overdue. The evidence is that it appears to work only by the application of larger and larger dollops of debt for every participating sector, and this debt has served to mask the failure of the global system as presently constructed.
So we’re caught in a cleft stick – the planet is struggling to support more of us, but our economic system can’t function with any less of us. Japan is the clear example of a country unwilling to consider immigration but unable to maintain economic momentum based on its natural population growth alone.
It is because of this understanding that I have been banging on about these unpalatable thoughts for well over five years now, and I can’t pretend it’s been an awful lot of fun for me either. But those of us who were lucky enough to be born following World War II have a responsibility to cut the BS we’ve been feeding each other and come very sharply to our senses. We have collectively constructed financial, economic and political systems on a global basis that are unsustainable, regardless of the way the numbers are cast.
In the past the discovery of such a devastating truth has generally stimulated widespread protectionist trade policies, followed inevitably by xenophobic antagonism that has always finally led to outright war. Surely this time we will have the wits to conjure up some appropriate alternative to such a horrific result. If not then history will have taught us absolutely nothing, and not only will we actively impoverish our young, we’ll then send them off to slaughter as well.
Wayne Lochore
Posted in Economy, Foreign Exchange, Politics | 2 Comments »
Monday, October 19th, 2009
The traditional carry trade – the NZD/JPY and AUD/JPY – has kicked in again in the last couple of weeks, in line with another surge in global share prices and the recent RBA tightening. Even NZ news added to the pressure with inflation running faster than expected (but not high enough to concern the RBNZ).
In simple terms the driving force appears to be the huge US stimulus. Historically money creation on this scale has created inflation. In recent decades the inflation pressure has tended to come through in asset prices. There in lies the quandary. The global authorities know that facilitating the asset bubbles of earlier years was a mistake, so surely they will respond this time sooner i.e. tighten monetary policy.
Some are doing this already e.g. the RBA. Others such as the BOE are hinting that they are coming round to this thinking. Comments from US Fed Chairman Bernanke will be listened to closely this week.
In the meantime the global good-news story will continue, strong Chinese growth likely to be reported this week and probably higher than expected Australian inflation next week judging by the NZ out-turn.
This all adds to short-term upward pressure on the NZD (except against the AUD and CAD, and maybe excepting the GBP now) but the risk of a sharp turnaround remains.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
There have been some atypical movements in currency markets in the last week or so but at the end of the day the global recovery story continues, share prices are still pushing higher and the central banks around the world are loathe to act, suggesting the current upward NZD/USD momentum is not over yet.
There have been murmurs of disquiet with a low USD, and hence high EUR and JPY as well as high NZD, but there appears no concrete action imminent.
Meanwhile stronger NZ economic statistics – including probably business confidence released Wednesday – and talk of a near-term RBA tightening suggest the local currencies remain to the fore of any rally against a weak USD.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, September 21st, 2009
The NZD remains caught up in global forces. Last week the NZD generally weakened, falling against 30 of 38 monitored currencies but it was the gain against the weakening USD (and GBP) that received most attention. Over 4 weeks the NZD has appreciated against 34 of these currencies with one of the exceptions being the AUD. In other words, the RBNZ has not managed to disentangle the NZD from the weak USD on the one hand and the strong AUD on the other. There is the possibility that the release of NZ June quarter GDP Thursday (see Calendar) may shake the NZD free a little but more likely the fate of the NZD will rest with the major global trends.
Here the key tension is mounting evidence of global improvement and a reticence by central banks to respond for fear of derailing the nascent recovery. This is creating an abundance of US dollars and a goldilocks period for risky assets, especially when priced in USD. This period cannot last and the question is when the (relatively) little bubble is pricked. Ten years ago the answer was more likely later rather than sooner, the attitude being any remaining problems can be patched up afterwards. The recent experience of the financial crisis suggests central bankers should not allow bubble-like conditions to persist. Already there is tightening occurring outside the largest economies Bloomberg.
One example of the imbalances that the current policy settings cause is the Chinese yuan. It could be argued that a weaker USD is appropriate given global conditions but the USD is not just the USD – it is also the Chinese yuan (and the Hong Kong dollar) as the yuan is very closely linked to the USD at present. The end result is the EUR/CNY has now moved above the long-run average and there will be increasing calls within Europe for either a lower EUR or a higher CNY.
It is unlikely that the meeting of G20 leaders Thursday/Friday will provide a reaction plan, nor the US Fed meeting Wednesday (Thur 6:15am NZ time). But market players will increasingly focus on exit strategies (i.e. tighter monetary policy) in the next few weeks.
In terms of the NZD/USD, the momentum remains upward but the risk of a sharp turnaround is high.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, September 14th, 2009
Any post-MPS NZD selling was brief and more than offset by subsequent buying. In fact the NZD was one of the strongest currencies in the world last week (slightly behind the Russian ruble), posting the ninth consecutive weekly NZD/USD gain.
It is apparent that the RBNZ are reluctant to respond to the stronger NZD, conceding they believe there is little they can do to influence the NZD – the result was the NZD/AUD rising 1.5% over the rest of the week.
However, the NZD/AUD remains within the upper half of an approximate 77-83c range. It is likely to remain within this range, including moving below 80c once market participants return to focusing on the probable gap between any RBA and RBNZ tightening (i.e. the RBA moving much sooner than the RBNZ).
Meanwhile the NZD/USD strength rests on a weak USD and strong share markets. There are global forces that could reverse both or each of these trends quickly. A bias towards selling the NZD at these levels appears appropriate but that is not to say the NZD/USD could not rise further in the short-term.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, September 7th, 2009
Movements in financial markets went against the usual patterns last week – AUD, GBP, NZD up but so too the JPY, all happening while share and oil prices declined. Significantly another wave of Chinese share market weakness failed to spark wider large-scale selling.
There are many questions about sustainability of current share prices (and an upward trend) but global economic news keeps showing up evidence of improvement. Locally the signs of improvement for August include NZ housing activity again up judging by Barfoot’s Auckland sales, likewise dairy prices, while retail sales failed to kick ahead but are improved on first half 2009 judging by Paymark electronic transactions.
Policy makers are taking a cautious approach to the global green shoots, generally adopting a no-tightening-soon approach. Significantly the RBA passed up the opportunity last week to warn of tightening ahead, although their comments were non-committal.
Over the weekend, the G20 said “fiscal and monetary policy would stay expansionary as long as needed to ensure recovery”. The danger with this approach is that it sets up a greater knee-jerk reaction some months ahead – the eventual tightening will remain a market focus.
In the meantime, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand are likely to take this offshore lead by central banks and, consistent with their own earlier comments, play down the likelihood of near-term interest rate hikes when presenting the Monetary Policy Statement Thursday 9am. They may even go so far as to drop the cash rate by 0.25% to 2.25% p.a.
These present mixed forces for currency markets: the delay to the inevitable global tightening and the current growth momentum imply a rising NZD; the prospect of a dovish RBNZ and current nervousness about global share prices imply ample downside risks as well. A prudent approach would be to put more weight on the RBNZ this week and sell NZD ahead of Thursday.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, August 31st, 2009
The currency, and financial markets generally, are largely in a holding pattern at present – the weakening GBP an exception – in part due to a lull in information releases, in part due to Northern hemisphere holidays and in part due to markets having reached a natural point of inflection.
New information is probably required to shift sentiment strongly, one way or other.
The US S&P 500 share price index is now 54% above its 6-Mar low. This is about where the rebound rallies ended for Italy and France in the 1960s, the US, Switzerland and Europe in the 1970s and Japan in the 1990s.
There were post-crash rebounds at other times that have gone further but we are in the zone where the recovery glow has tended to wane (see Morgan Stanley on the history of bear markets). Meanwhile we also remain within the time of year most prone to share market falls and we have insiders selling while the general public are buying.
And to cap it off, we know that governments will have to tighten monetary and fiscal policy at some stage over the next couple of years (the Chinese have started already, contributing to a 3.4% share market decline last week).
This makes for nervous markets, and most likely volatility.
From a momentum perspective, the near-term bias is likely to be upwards, there being little to indicate that the ‘good news’ is about to stop. For the NZD, upward pressure is also likely to come from an RBA approaching the time of its first tightening (don’t discount the possibility of a surprise rate hike Tuesday – the Australian cash rate is at emergency levels no longer required and it is now 5 months since their last easing, the same gap waited back in 2002 before the first-in-the-cycle rate hike).
From a value perspective, current levels in the share markets and NZD appear over-priced relative to the risks ahead.
In summary, the NZD/USD at 70c remains a strong possibility. But that need not prevent the NZD/USD again reaching 60c before Xmas as well.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, August 24th, 2009
The goldilocks period continues for the global financial markets – the news at the margin is largely positive (the level of activity is not!) while interest rates are very low – and hence up go global share prices, the price of oil and along with them the NZD, including the NZD/GBP passing the same peak reached in 2005 and 2008 (but not the NZD/CAD).
There is one major challenge to this scenario this week – the US government issuing another massive round of debt Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday – but the lack of other major scheduled financial news suggests the momentum carries the NZD generally higher in the next few days, and maybe weeks.
However it still remains difficult to see the NZD/USD, for instance, remaining above 70c over a period of months.
Background articles of interest …
1) Investor confidence is now high according to the Merrill Lynch monthly survey of global fund managers, the index reaching its highest level since Nov-03 – a warning to all contrarians (and, yes, the S&P 500 did drop in the first half of 2004, by 5%).
2) The challenge ahead: removing the massive US stimulus in place without derailing the economy, and while holding onto your job Yahoo
3) Of a similar theme, former Morgan Stanley Analyst Andy Xie believes we are amidst a pure liquidity bubble, a temporary equilibrium that depends largely on the US and Chinese governments and – as do the IMF – that a sustained recovery requires a rebalancing of US and Chinese savings rates. Some other observations: the Chinese growth rate is slowing right now; liquidity is fueling a rising oil price trend. And forecasts: the US Fed will start raising interest rates within 6 months; asset prices will weaken next year.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, August 17th, 2009
There is a growing sense that the worst of the global recession is over. There is also further evidence that conditions are improving in New Zealand. Meanwhile there are not many events due in the next couple of weeks to rattle confidence in the recovery scenario. This is a backdrop that would normally favour a higher NZ dollar, just like the old days.
The problem is that a return to the old days seems inconceivable; surely people and policy-makers will change their ways? Well, that is yet to be determined. Currently we can point to high levels of global liquidity. We can point to speculative activity in global assets markets. And we can point to central banks reluctant to act, for fear of derailing the recovery (or our central bank threatening “the OCR could still move modestly lower“). All reminiscent of 2003.
Eventually, though, there will be fiscal and monetary tightening. It is unlikely that any exit strategy will occur smoothly. Thus there is plenty of volatility ahead. It is tempting to anticipate this policy response by selling NZ dollars now but the NZ dollar is likely to move higher in the near-term.
Background articles …
1) Growth rates have proven to be generally better than feared in the June quarter (NZ and Australia yet to be reported) with growth in Germany and France amongst Europe, and generally in Asia. But overall output did decline in the Eurozone, as was the case in the US. Both paled besides Russia. These data, plus more recent figures pointing to improvement have prompted economists to increase growth predictions (WSJ) for second half 2009. It appears the worst is behind us.
2) There has been more confirmation of a local recovery also: confidence up in the general monthly BNZ survey; pockets of regional job recovery reported by Hays Specialist Recruitment; greater confidence about housing in the quarterly ASB survey; and, more forward-looking, Infometrics forecast the fast-population, slow-construction mismatch to show as 11% higher house prices over 12 months.
3) In the US corporate world, 91% of US S&P 500 companies having reported June quarter results and the pattern is clear: US profits are still rising faster than expected for most but sales are still falling – down 5% in the quarter – and meanwhile corporates are sitting on near-record levels of cash; the market has re-rated share prices but not near-term earnings, thus pushing the P/E on prospective 12-months operating earnings higher but at 14.4 it remains below the 18-year average of 18.4. The implication: there is potential for further sharp share price rises IF sales growth were to emerge.
4) Here is where policy becomes relevant. At present the central banks are adopting a stimulative stance, such as the Fed maintaining “exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period“. But eventually they will have to unwind the huge monetary stimulus in place. When? Some point to 1937 and suggest the central bank response will be slow and gradual. But there is also the lesson of the too-slow US tightening of 2003-2004 to keep in mind.
5) Meanwhile signs of the old excesses are already emerging; on Wall Street; and in the local housing market with banks again offering high LVR loans and real estate agents talking of missing out.
Tags: Anthony Byett, currency, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
|
|
FREE Email News
Today's Market Numbers
| NZX 50 Index |
3325.97 |
 |
1.30 |
| S&P/ASX 200 |
4263.50 |
 |
27.20 |
| Dow Jones Industrials |
12884.00 |
 |
5.80 |
Stock Quote
Most Commented On
|