Archive for June, 2009
Tuesday, June 30th, 2009
My warning last week of potential for weak share prices in July (and maybe through to October) and hence potential for a weaker NZD during this period is not universally shared, as to be expected.
There are two weak parts to the argument.
First share prices may not weaken. JPMorgan was one institution to come out with its view last week that we should expect positive earnings announcement surprises come late July, when the bulk of US non-financial quarterly results are released.
Second the currency-equity link has weakened in recent weeks, as evidenced by the NZD/USD rising 0.5% last week while the S&P500 dropped -0.3%. Meanwhile there are other conflicting forces acting on exchange rates such as commodity prices peaking (Tuatara) and China’s repeated calls for a lessor USD role as a reserve currency (Reuters). The NZD appears caught in the middle of these forces, wavering amidst these global forces rather than reacting to local news such as declining NZ GDP.
The bigger picture appears more one of wait-and-see. There was a burst of new confidence in markets from mid March through to early May that included the NZD/USD rallying from near 50c (but also the NZD/AUD moving broadly sideways). We are now seeing this confidence reflected in economists’ forecasts, including the OECD’s first global growth forecast upgrade last week in many months. That markets reacted first is quite normal. More recently market movements suggest some ambivalence about the next stage. While it is reasonable to expect better times ahead – and most do – the enormity of the current problems suggest ’shocks’ could just as easily be negative. The forecasting difficulty is whether the small increases in US jobless claims and bank credit default swap (CDS) indices in the last two weeks are just noise or whether they warn of a larger negative shock ahead.
While US ISM and jobs figures this week may help, it may be several weeks yet before the next major move becomes clear.
In the meantime there is no compelling evidence yet to suggest the equity-currency link has been entirely broken. The S&P 500 has fallen over 3% in 21 weeks during 2008 and 2009, and in 15 of those weeks the NZD/USD has fallen also (i.e. most but not all). History has shown the next few weeks to be a period when markets are prone to large equity sell-offs. Current circumstances appear ripe for such a negative shock again. There is no certainty of a share and NZD fall but it would be prudent to take advantage of any NZD rallies at present to hedge against a weaker NZD if that is where your major risk lies.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, June 29th, 2009
In this Money@Work, we take a look at a product being promoted at the moment; Zeeland Notes Series 1 from RaboBank and Intercap.
We ask some questions about the offer in this week’s column.
What is it called and what sort of savings product is it?
Zeeland Notes Series 1 is a deposit notes security.
Who is the company behind it?
Rabobank linked up with Intercap to offer the product.
Who is the target market?
With the option of a direct debt and a minimum investment of $5,000, the security’s looking at retail investors.
What does the return offer?
On maturity, investors can expect a return of between 0% and 80% depending on the initial level of the S&P/ASX 200 index and the average of six-monthly observations in the last two and a half years of the note’s life.
When was it launched?
The offer closes on July 14.
What other products is it like or is it competing with?
Liontamer’s Australia Series notes are also looking take leverage future gains on the Australian stock-market.
Is it long term, short term or medium term?
A medium-term way to lock up your money for five-years (although it does offer a monthly redemption facility).
What is the unique selling point?
The capital amount will be repaid regardless of whether the index falls, and the notes are hedged to the kiwi, so should avoid the currency’s volatility. Did we mention the direct debit option?
How strong a stomach do you need for it?
If you’re confident Australian equities have troughed and the only way is up then you should be fine, otherwise there could be some gut-wrenching moments.
What’s the hitch?
While offering funds for Rabobank, they’re a tad pricey with extra fees for Intercap and the brokers selling the product.
Tags: Money@Work, RaboBank, Savings Products Posted in Money@Work | No Comments »
Friday, June 26th, 2009
As if we didn’t already know, the first half of 2009 is turning out to be a real stinker.
Today’s economic growth statistics, showing a 1% economic contraction in the first three months of the year, were worse than the “green shoots” enthusiasts had been expecting and, just for good measure, the contraction in the last quarter of 2008 was revised to 1% as well.
March quarter to March quarter, the economy has shrunk by 2.7% over the last year and we now have the first full-year economic decline since 1992.
While the March balance of payments deficit looked a little better, although still at a whacking 8.5% of GDP, it was collapsing imports that drove the improvement, somewhat offset by a fall in exports.
At the same time, the country’s net liabilities to foreigners rose to 98.2% of GDP, as foreign funds flooded back into New Zealand over the first three months of the year to shore up our shortfall with the rest of the world. The danger that that support could dry up some day is as real as it ever was.
It’s likely that the three months to June 30 won’t be much prettier. While New Zealand’s unemployment rate, at 5%, is still lower than OECD counterparts, concentration in the last few days on figures that make the downturn real – 1,000-plus dole registrations a week – have dented the fragile mood of optimism shown in the only leading indicator out this week, the Westpac-McDermott Miller consumer confidence index.
Even this was a mixed bag. A net 29% of people still think they’ll be worse off in a year’s time. While that’s a big drop in pessimism from three months earlier, the uptick in consumer sentiment is largely driven by a sense that we must be through the worst and that the five-year horizon looks a bit brighter.
There’s also a sense that there are some damn good bargains out there for whiteware, televisions and cars. That’s got to be the main reason for a net 16% saying they think now is a good time to buy a major household appliance, although lower interest rates and the April tax cuts may also be prising the national wallet ajar.
Meanwhile, the Government’s honeymoon is waning fast, with the political commentariat increasingly skeptical that the Beehive is capable of controlling its own agenda. Its PR blunders are increasingly only mitigated by force of the Prime Minister’s personality, while a tangle of major policy initiatives threatens to turn the perception of “can do” into “too much to do.” With public hearings on the super-city plan now in sight, expect a bruising few weeks ahead in the country’s most-important political marketplace, Auckland.
Add to this a string of gruesome murder trials dominating the news agenda and I, for one, can’t wait till spring.
That’s when some sort of slow economic pick-up should start to kick in and, if it’s going to happen, we should see that reflected in more leading indicators over the next few weeks. The National Bank’s monthly Business Outlook is one of the most-watched, and is due next week, while the NZIER Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion is due the following week.
Perhaps the biggest worry in all of this, however, is the direction of the New Zealand dollar. It took a mild hit after the GDP numbers, but with our interest rates looking attractive by global standards and a collective sigh of relief apparent among savers in Japan and Europe about the world economic outlook, there appears to be plenty of support for the Kiwi over coming months.
Quite apart from anything else, a flood of new uridashi and eurokiwi bond issues through July and August appears likely to be well-supported and, in turn, provide support for the Kiwi.
Yet the strength or weakness of the dollar is perhaps the most important determining factor for how quickly or slowly the economy recovers, with Finance Minister Bill English reiterating the importance of a resurgent export sector to overcoming the big structural imbalances which this week’s current account and GDP figures have again laid bare.
“In the past five years, the tradeables sector of the economy – including exporting and manufacturing – has actually been in recession,” says English. At the same time, the non-tradeables sector “has grown reasonably strongly. This has contributed to a deteriorating current account deficit and had stymied New Zealand’s economic performance.” “This situation is clearly unsustainable,” he said. Well spotted, Bill.
The question remains, however, where the sustainable upturn will come from. If, as expected, the global economy is starting to turn for the better, then the most stimulatory fiscal conditions for a generation or more should underpin local consumer confidence, along with booming inward migration as refugees from worse-affected economies come home to try again here. But that doesn’t make a jot of difference to the success of New Zealand exporters.
As new research in the latest Reserve Bank Bulletin shows, New Zealand firms have very high failure rates in export markets, with the vast majority of export relationships failing within a year of being established, and kiwi exporters generally forced to transact in currencies other than our own.
The long-term answer to that remains the “200 things we have to get right,” as English put it recently when discussing the need for big productivity gains to close our own gaps, let alone those with the rest of the world. Far too few of those policies are evident yet and, in the sense that prescription has barely changed over the years while commitment to the cure remains lacking, the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Tags: Pattrick Smellie, Smellie Sniffs The Breeze Posted in Economy | No Comments »
Friday, June 26th, 2009
The nation expects its politicians to spin those damned statistics into lies and Immigration Minister Jonathan Coleman, has not disappointed with this highly questionable ‘release’ claiming credit for National’s leadership qualities and tax relief in reversing the country’s so-called brain drain.
“We said in our manifesto we’d retain Kiwis and attract overseas Kiwis home – and we are doing just that,” Coleman boasts in this delusional statement.
Even discounting the ridiculous notion that politics of any sort would affect the migration patterns of the self-interested Kiwi there are huge holes in Coleman’s claim.
For one, there is much dispute about the true extent and significance (or even existence) of the ‘brain drain’ itself. For example, Statistics New Zealand, the same government-owned entity that supplied the figures to Coleman showing that in May “net annual inflows of permanent and long-term migrants reached their highest levels in two years”, has produced its own myth-busting interpretation of long-term migration flow figures.
“The figures do not support the idea of a ‘brain drain’, as even though we do lose some, New Zealand has a net gain of skilled people,” Statistics NZ says. “The concept of a ‘brain exchange’ seems to be a better fit to the figures. How these ‘brains’ are used once in New Zealand (e.g. doctors driving taxis) could, however, be debated.”
More importantly, the reasons why New Zealanders are returning home now (or not leaving) are almost certainly based around economics, not politics. New Zealand does not look like such a bad destination when you consider the declining employment opportunities and fraught social arrangements in the crowded, dirty cities common in more populated parts of the world – we have food and water – as financial havoc rages.
If anything, Coleman should be worried about the returning ‘brains’, who quite possibly might be over-represented by people who have lost their plum jobs pulling pints in a London pub or their roles as chief ‘door bitch’ outside seedy Sydney clubs and have come back to sign on the dole and live with their mums.
We used to be good at exporting unemployment – what’s gone wrong?
But New Zealand is also benefiting from a steady flow of non-indigenous immigrants who recognise the country might be quite a good place to ride out a financial crisis, or your final years.
Many UK retirees, for instance, are heading this way and, thanks to a law change made a couple of years ago, they’re bringing their pensions with them to spend the rest of their lives.
Tags: David Chaplin Posted in Economy, Personal Finance | 1 Comment »
Thursday, June 25th, 2009
There was a tinge of pre-emptive nostalgia in Vance Arkinstall’s statement issued last week predicting the “inevitable” demise of adviser commissions linked to the sale of investment products.
“Commission has long been an effective way of spreading the cost of investment advice and has made investment in products much more affordable,” Arkinstall, who heads the Insurance Savings and Investment Association (ISI), said in the release.
But with the ISI’s Australian counterpart, the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA), recently announcing it would demand its members end adviser commissions on superannuation products, it seems the jig is up: commissions must go in New Zealand too.
However, I don’t think commissions will disappear here anytime soon. Arkinstall’s statement was really just a vague suggestion – a debate-starter. The IFSA declaration limits itself to removing adviser commissions on compulsory superannuation products only, which is a big deal in the trillion-dollar Aussie industry. The New Zealand equivalent is KiwiSaver, which already has strict controls on adviser payments.
In Australia, IFSA has left its members free to charge commissions willy-nilly on non-super products. Like the ISI, IFSA also does not represent the country’s entire investment community leaving plenty of loopholes for the commission arbitrageurs.
Admittedly, the Australian Financial Planning Association (FPA) has revealed more widespread plans to phase out commissions on all products for its members, which it claims is 90 per cent of the advisory industry. The New Zealand advisory associations have not been quite so bold, absorbed as they are with other more pressing issues, like coming regulation and staying in business.
But the trend is clear, adviser commissions are on the way out or more likely to be renamed as something more PR-friendly (note, for example, the “plan service fee” in the IFSA release). The debate in Australia, however, is moving beyond adviser-bagging with Jeremy Cooper, a former regulator who now heads one of the numerous government enquiries into the superannuation business, now questioning the appropriateness of any asset-based fee on compulsory super products.
“Percentage fees should be looked at very carefully and trustees should be asking why fees structured in this way are appropriate,” Cooper told the Sydney Morning Herald. “These fees operate like a wealth tax; they attach themselves to your super savings.”
One of Australia’s influential asset consultants – which determine where many superannuation funds invest – has also called for a ‘fixed fee’ model across all funds management business. In this story carried on Australian investment industry website Investment & Technology, Fiona Trafford, head of Frontier Investment Consulting, said: “Our aim is to de-link funds manager revenue from assets under management. Funds management is one of the few industries which is selling hope…. How about a fixed-dollar fee, which you could ratchet up each year with inflation, and a performance fee?”
I look forward to the day when the ISI starts promoting this concept.
Tags: David Chaplin Posted in Personal Finance | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009
To me the fate of the NZD still rests with the US share market. If the S&P500 drops in the next few weeks, so too will the NZD. If the S&P500 rallies, here comes 70c.
The seasonal forces favour the downside. In the last 20 years the S&P500 has shown an upward bias: there was a 60% more chance that prices would rally in a month rather than fall. Not for July.
The market has fallen 7 of the last 10 Julys. The 20-year average S&P500 return for the September quarter was -1.3%; the average for the other quarters were positive.
We are entering a time that was always going to create anxiety, even before consideration is given to current economic conditions and financial market expectations.
Now, 7 out of 10 falls does not mean the 11th month will be negative also. But with the way expectations have become hyped and with the trouble the global economy is in, prudence would suggest having some cover against falling share prices in the next few weeks; likewise cover against a lower NZD.
Tags: Anthony Byett, Foreign Exchange Posted in Foreign Exchange | No Comments »
Monday, June 22nd, 2009
Welcome to our Money@Work column. Each week we will be looking into a new investment product.
What is it called and what sort of savings product is it?
Innovative Tier 1 hybrid securities is a $150 million perpetual bond issue.
Who is the company behind it?
Bank of New Zealand’s Australian parent National Australia Bank is raising cash for the New Zealand subsidiary’s day-to-day operation.
Who is the target market?
New Zealand retail and wholesale investors who are looking for a relatively safe fixed-interest investment while assets with higher yields continue to look volatile.
What does the return offer?
The bond offers 9.1% per annum for the first five years and resets with a margin of 4.09% above the five-year swap rate in 2014.
When was it launched?
The offer closes on June 23.
What other products is it like or is it competing with?
Perpetual bonds are popular among investors who’ve been spooked by the slump in equity markets. BNZ and ANZ both launched similar, if less attractive, perpetual offers last year, and several large corporates such as Fonterra and Contact Energy have issued bonds to boost their balance sheets in recent times.
Is it long term, short term or medium term?
This is a long-term investment to tie up money with the “safe as banks” motto.
What is the unique selling point?
The reset margin of 4.09% is hot, and it enjoys the tax benefits of being inside a Portfolio Investment Entity structure.
How strong a stomach do you need for it?
Pretty mild really – with an annual return of 9.1% for the first five years and a decent margin afterwards, it looks like a perfect pitch for the meek.
What’s the hitch?
It may get the kybosh put on it at the end of the first tranche, with the reset margin significantly higher than other perpetuals on offer.
Tags: Money@Work Posted in Investing, Money@Work, Personal Finance | No Comments »
Sunday, June 21st, 2009
Getting your head around the electricity takes about two years. That’s what I found anyway.
In some ways, the power companies are very simple businesses that send an invisible, inevitably commoditised stream of electrons down wires and collect the money that pays to keep people lit, warm, and in work.
Not so fast.
All that free wind and water is handy – but it’s only free fuel. Not much use if you haven’t got an engine to run it in. Power stations cost a poultice to build, and they can last between 30 and 150 years. You don’t build them lightly and you’re stuck with the consequences if you don’t get it right.
If we paid the true cost for electricity from the Clyde Dam – the subject of billion dollar-plus cost over-runs to fix unforeseen geological instability – electricity would cost a lot more than it does today.
Likewise, pioneering renewables giant Meridian Energy is finding that its newest windfarm, behind Wellington, struggles to produce electricity at less than $100 per Megawatt hour, in a market where the hourly wholesale price in recent months has often been lower than $60.
Meanwhile, with great scads of hydro-electric water trapped in the South Island because the Cook Strait cable isn’t working properly and a third of the energy-hungry Rio Tinto aluminium smelter at Bluff has been out of commission, wholesale prices have been as low as 2 per cents per MWh in Meridian’s stronghold, the South Island.
Meridian is also in the gun with its shareholder Minister, Simon Power, who has identified it as the worst-performing of the electricity SOE’s, and is putting the screws on for something better than last year’s 3% return on capital.
Meridian and other SOE’s will have to show how they will up their performance in their Statements of Corporate Intent, due with Ministers in less than a fortnight on June 30.
At the same time as being told to make more money, the electricity SOE’s are also being told not to raise their electricity tariffs, at least until the results of a Ministerial review of the electricity sector is known.
That’s not likely before October this year, if not longer, and electricity retailers’ pricing and marketing is much more competitive than it used to be.
For example, the biggest private player, Contact Energy, is eating profit margins by freezing its prices till the end of next winter in key markets. This is to achieve two things: to stem recent customer losses and to act humble following the flawed but politically potent Wolak report on the use of market power in the wholesale electricity market.
Commerce Commission officials totted up the numbers in Wolak and came up with the highly dubious but unforgettable claim that power companies had “over-charged” by $4.3 billion during the three dry winters between 2001 and 2007.
While no one close to the ministerial review process sees that as a credible number, it was the kind of shiny button of a number that was just the thing for the populist and energetic Energy Minister, Gerry Brownlee.
So great are the expectations that Brownlee has created of a “big fix” for the power system that he is now obliged to come up with something that the average person will acknowledge as being “big”. I’m only guessing, but I suspect it won’t be enough to announce, for example, further development of tradeable financial transmission rights – one thing that everyone in the industry thinks would be a good idea, but which nobody up at the shops has heard of.
As a consequence, there has been on the breeze some excited chatter lately regarding a section of the Wolak report that advocates reallocating power stations amongst the SOE’s, to give a North Island generator some South Island hydro, and a South Island generator some North Island thermal – i.e., gas or coal-fired – plant.
The fact that parties in the market today could achieve effectively the same outcome by writing hedge contracts for one another’s output is irrelevant. Such an exercise in deck-chair shuffling could be politically powerful.
It could also be just what the doctor ordered for Genesis Energy, which owns and would love to be shot of the ageing gas and coal-fired 1000 Megawatt plant at Huntly. Might it nudge enthusiastically a review process looking for theatre as well as policy improvement to the view that Meridian might pick up Huntly? Probably too Machiavellian, but the electricity issue is so politicised at present that stranger things could happen.
Naturally, this combination of forces is all a bit of a worry if you’re Meridian.
With a relatively small 183,000 or so customers – Genesis and Contact both have around half a million each – Meridian struggles with economies of scale and, say industry observers, high inherited cost structures.
The annual cost to serve a customer – around $150 at Contact or TrustPower – is reportedly over $300 per customer at Meridian -an unsustainable position that must almost certainly mean that Meridian will face job cuts to meet its Minister’s wishes.
And if it’s handed Huntly, which still does sometimes run on coal, that would make quite a dent in Meridian’s all renewables story.
Throw in the uncertainty that is, if anything, growing around climate change policy and the introduction of an amended Emissions Trading Scheme, and it’s as confusing a time as it’s ever been to be in the power game.
Tags: Pattrick Smellie, Smellie Sniffs The Breeze Posted in General | 1 Comment »
Friday, June 19th, 2009
I bypassed the sandwiches, cakes and scones with cream and jam assembled on a table in the foyer and, after a brief word with ING’s marketing manager, took my seat at the end of row two. The view outside set the mood perfectly.
The murky waves looked as though they were about to crash through the huge glass bay windows of the Napier War Memorial conference centre, which sits right on the edge of the stony Marine Parade beach. There was nothing but grey skies over Hawke’s Bay on this miserable winter afternoon.
But the real misery was on display inside the room where about 200 investors in the so-called ING ‘frozen funds’ sat to hear the sad story of how their money had evaporated and also to vent their fury at the highly-paid executives who they blamed for its disappearance.
The 20-minute primer on how collateralised debt obligation (CDO) funds work, presented by David Jansen, the portfolio manager who made the day-to-day decisions on what to with the ING investors’ money, was only interrupted a few times (“how much of your money was in it?”).
“The market has assumed default rates over the next three to four years at Depression-era levels,” Jansen told a stunned and quite possibly uncomprehending audience, adding that he thought it wouldn’t be that bad, maybe just a long recession.
It probably isn’t much comfort to those who have lost a fair chunk of their life savings that they’re merely shouldering a small part of the estimated US$15 trillion decline in global asset values over the last 18 months, no matter how true.
I found Jansen’s educational talk technically of interest but the investors were clearly here for the bloodletting.
Helen Troup, ING NZ chief, did her best to empathise but no talk of “sharing your pain” was going to keep things calm. What followed was over an hour of outrage, ignorance, pathos, bemusement, yelling, grandstanding, pointed questions, erratic microphones and some top-rate emceeing from Brian Edwards.
At the end of it investors were still left with some tough decisions to make: accept the not-too-bad ING offer and waive all rights to sue ING, ANZ, any of their associated corporate entities and financial advisers, or; hang on to the investments and chase whoever they can expensively through the courts.
About half of those present appeared willing to accept the ING proposal. Those considering the lawyer route were given no encouragement by the Securities Commission, which issued a release saying there was nothing untoward about the ING offer.
“Investors should seek independent legal and/or financial advice if they do not understand the proposal or are unsure which option to take,” the Commission statement says – which many of them could argue is what got them into trouble in the first place.
However, just to clarify any confusion about what constitutes ‘independent’ advice the release says: “In this case ‘independent’ means an adviser who does not stand to benefit from the release from legal claims.”
Most of those investors shuffling out into the bitter southerly looked as though they were finished with advice.
Tags: David Chaplin, ING Posted in Personal Finance | 3 Comments »
Thursday, June 18th, 2009
According to the publisher, tragically, many of Gareth Morgan’s predictions in his bestselling 2007 book Pension Panic, have come to bear.
His new follow-up book, After the panic: Surviving bad investments and bad advice, is out soon.
After the panic sure packs a punch and is a bitter pill to swallow; but Gareth Morgan also lays down a way forward.
Here’s some info on the new book plus be sure to check out the special deal we have for ShareChat readers below.
 After the Panic - new book by Gareth Morgan
A champion of ordinary Kiwis, Morgan says his new book is for all of those decent and hard-working people who have been so badly let down by regulators, policy makers and individual company directors. He’s determined to do whatever he can to make sure that this never ever happens again.
“It’s a disgrace what’s happened. Look at all of the finance companies and money that’s gone down the tubes in the last couple of years,” says Morgan.
“The property market is in tatters and lots of super schemes are in trouble.
“But, we’ve finally brought to an end this international 20 years of excess credit. It was just nuts. There were even government agencies who were lending people the money for their deposits if they didn’t have it for Pete’s sake.
“Now we’re facing a world without fast and loose credit and banks have to go back to core business. If you don’t have the 20% deposit you can’t get the money for the house. It’s that simple. End of story. This is the way it was for our parents and their parents. But, for a whole new generation this is a new thing.
“We need this book so we can figure out how to move forward. Although there’s been a lot of stuff swirling about in the media with names being mentioned here and there I suspect people were so overwhelmed with the unrelenting bad news that they ended up switching off – almost desensitised or so worn down by it all that they’ve disengaged. And this is dangerous.
“If we’re to learn anything out of this mess it is that people can’t disengage. It’s time now to take a breath and say: ‘Okay. So what can we do to stop this from ever happening again.’
“People need to be far more informed and ask a lot more questions. Investing is always going to be a risk but it needs to be a considered one, not one based on a pack of lies and half truths. People can’t just sit back and rely on others to make good choices for them.
Unfortunately, trust in the industry has long gone out the window and we can’t rely on people to do the right thing anymore. There are a lot of sharks out there and they’re already circling again.
“Hopefully I provide people with everything they need to better equip themselves if they’re going to play the money game. It needs to be a level playing field and my book provides them with a pretty good place to start.”
Morgan says one of the most important points of the book is to make sure we’re not just seeing the crisis as a financial and economic downturn; it exposes an epidemic of behaviour from members of the financial sector that’s long been contrary to the public interest.
“First up I look at how the global recession was triggered and talk about the challenges of economic growth. Then I deal with the regulators and their role in the collapse. Why did it happen – why did we have that excess and how did it come about? I sheet that home to the central banks and that it was just irresponsible central banking allowing their commercial banks to forget about credential ratios like having a 20% deposit. As soon as things started to tighten the whole thing went over and it finally got exposed. So what do the regulators do about it now?
“Then there’s what’s left of the financial sector which is looking pretty sick. We’ve seen some blimmin shonky activity going on. But it’s not just shonky. The whole sector to me has got this high level of incompetence. We need to examine that.
“Then there are the individuals. I couldn’t put this book out without mentioning names. These people have been pretty much invisible, hiding behind limited liability companies. They can simply shut up shop and open for business the next day. That’s fine if the system allows it but the public needs to keep track of these opera¬tors for when they resurface.
“We need a public record and here you have it. The names are already out there but I wanted this book to be a one-stop-shop to make it as easy as possible for the mum-and-dad investors and generations to come to never again go through what we have. It’s been a very, very, very painful lesson which will be felt for generations to come.”
If you would like to order a copy of After the Panic by Gareth Morgan for $37.95, click here.
—————————————————————————————
*F R E E S H I P P I N G*
Receive free shipping on this product if you place your order by midnight Wednesday 24 June. (save $4.75).*
Order online at www.goodreturns.co.nz/books or contact us on 0800 345 675.
To redeem this offer, enter the code ATP06 in the discount coupon box at payment or mention it to us when you call.
COUPON CODE: ATP06
————————————————————————————–
Tags: After the Panic, Gareth Morgan Posted in Personal Finance | No Comments »
|
|
FREE Email News
Today's Market Numbers
| NZX 50 Index |
3324.67 |
 |
9.50 |
| S&P/ASX 200 |
4290.70 |
 |
16.50 |
| Dow Jones Industrials |
12878.20 |
 |
33.10 |
Stock Quote
Most Commented On
|